Future solid waste scenarios

A rural county’s public works professionals evaluate future solid waste service scenarios, costs, and financing options.

10 MIN READ
Closing a landfill doesn’t completely eliminate operational costs. Local governments must monitor and collect methane and leachate for three decades. That’s a significant expense that Santa Cruz County, Ariz., Solid Waste Manager Karl Moyers is preparing for.

Luis F. Garcia

Closing a landfill doesn’t completely eliminate operational costs. Local governments must monitor and collect methane and leachate for three decades. That’s a significant expense that Santa Cruz County, Ariz., Solid Waste Manager Karl Moyers is preparing for.

Project details


Who: Santa Cruz County, Ariz., Solid Waste Division
Annual operating budget: $978,000
Number of employees: 11
Square miles: 1,238
Population: 47,000
Annual volume: 44,000 tons
30-year post-closure costs (2040 to 2070): $5.6 million

While landfills are generally getting larger, governments—particularly in rural and semi-rural areas—own many smaller facilities. Eventually, they’ll run out of room.

When they do, the costs associated with solid waste collection go away, but not those related to the landfill itself. Certain activities, such as monitoring and collecting methane and leachate, must continue. EPA requires private owners to fund these future expenditures via a surety guarantee or performance bond. However, publicly owned landfills are only required to estimate those costs. When it’s time to actually pay those bills, public solid waste agencies that haven’t planned ahead will be in the same boat as many government pension plans.

Santa Cruz County in Arizona is working to avoid that possibility. Even though the county’s 60-acre landfill isn’t expected to reach capacity for three decades, its board of supervisors has spent almost $562,000 on professional services over the last decade to develop a long-term waste-management strategy. They want to be able to continue providing collection and disposal services to 47,000 people, while ensuring their landfill meets federal and state regulatory requirements.

In part, this foresight was prompted by the loss of a major customer. But there was another impetus: their desire to relieve future Solid Waste Division managers and residents of the burden of making detailed, difficult financial and public service decisions under duress.

Next page: 50% drop in revenue prompts reassessment

No recommended contents to display.

Sidebar Single